This effectively just changes your in-game graphical settings, so it didn't have any effect here, as we were already playing on the lowest possible settings. We should point out that the tailored boosts come with a slider that lets you prioritize quality over performance and vice versa. However, we saw our frame rate drop from the low 40s to the mid-30s while using the zipline with the boost enabled, a considerable drop in performance. Our average FPS was 45 on Apex, with and without Cortex's Prime Boost mode. Improvements were relatively minimal with the older PC. So we tested both machines on 2 games, Apex Legends, and Warhammer: Vermintide II, to cover both a regular boost and a Prime Boost game. Switch between your customized lighting effects by utilizing the Switch Lighting keyboard function. The second is a more modern system running an i5-10400F and a GTX 1660 Super.Īs you can see, both machines aren't top-tier and could benefit from a boost to their gaming performance. Change the lighting effect and color of the Razer keyboard to your liking. At 75 resolution it gets around 30-40 fps which is definitely playable for Arma standards. On lowest settings, 100 resolution it gets about 25fps. ![]() The first machine is an older desktop that no longer runs newer games too well, running an intel i7-4770k and a GTX 660. Enjoying 'No Man's Sky' on the Go, on the Mac (blog post w/ video and specs) Arma 3 AS native port running on my M1 MacBook Air at 5120x1440p. We tested Razer Cortex on two different machines, one low-end, one mid-range. The real question is, does Cortex actually improve your games' performance, and if so, by how much.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |